2008/01/30
d on w ~ ....fictives
Deleuze is funny and sad. Parnet as always husky and forthright. She might be ill these days .
jill always knew and harboured suspicions about the witfellah. he . was death. mask. andthe post workers were the same. As they carried us to death. we moved fictives around. always mouth. cared to see. hurried to bear. bodied to wreck? not camped in bivouac to truck their gang plank ~
as air-borne rumours to love ~
becomes philo s were not assured of pensions place to stay or anything . poet on potty bum. poet on bum. precarious poet.as like a nude model ~ yer not give a home. a pension. retirement pension fo r Poets? holiday? o? really and training? o really well kickyer arse.
poets dont demonstrate.hmmmmmmmmm not too often
mostly remonstrate against self and other
ive suggested before creating rhizomactic groups of principle poets and writers in assemblages. to move forward principle before persona.lities.
its no go. ambition goverN the power structure. how does
one undo this>?
how create decomposed modes of relations among poets?
if poets /writers are workers who produce and they do;
well then one context their class and so on to start
this
but if one works outside of the framework
in a similar manner to the twelves stepping groups
these conflicts of interest may be by passed
depasse as one says.
jill always knew and harboured suspicions about the witfellah. he . was death. mask. andthe post workers were the same. As they carried us to death. we moved fictives around. always mouth. cared to see. hurried to bear. bodied to wreck? not camped in bivouac to truck their gang plank ~
as air-borne rumours to love ~
becomes philo s were not assured of pensions place to stay or anything . poet on potty bum. poet on bum. precarious poet.as like a nude model ~ yer not give a home. a pension. retirement pension fo r Poets? holiday? o? really and training? o really well kickyer arse.
poets dont demonstrate.hmmmmmmmmm not too often
mostly remonstrate against self and other
ive suggested before creating rhizomactic groups of principle poets and writers in assemblages. to move forward principle before persona.lities.
its no go. ambition goverN the power structure. how does
one undo this>?
how create decomposed modes of relations among poets?
if poets /writers are workers who produce and they do;
well then one context their class and so on to start
this
but if one works outside of the framework
in a similar manner to the twelves stepping groups
these conflicts of interest may be by passed
depasse as one says.
By
Dc_