2007/12/15
ubtract
In truth, it is not enough to say
"Long live the multiple," difficult as it is to raise that cry.
No typographical, lexical, or even syntactical cleverness is enough to make it heard.
The multiple must be made, not by always adding a higher dimension, but rather in
the simplest of ways,
by dint of sobriety, with the number of dimensions one already has available --
always n-1 (the only way the one belongs to the multiple:
always subtracted).
Subtract the unique from the multiplicity to be constituted; write at n-1 dimensions.
a system of this kind could be called a rhizome.
Indeed baby, the rhizome you got it
So perhap then all is context. yes, I think so too.
_______________________
(G.Deleuze and F.Guattari A Thousand Plateaus (6
"Long live the multiple," difficult as it is to raise that cry.
No typographical, lexical, or even syntactical cleverness is enough to make it heard.
The multiple must be made, not by always adding a higher dimension, but rather in
the simplest of ways,
by dint of sobriety, with the number of dimensions one already has available --
always n-1 (the only way the one belongs to the multiple:
always subtracted).
Subtract the unique from the multiplicity to be constituted; write at n-1 dimensions.
a system of this kind could be called a rhizome.
Indeed baby, the rhizome you got it
So perhap then all is context. yes, I think so too.
_______________________
(G.Deleuze and F.Guattari A Thousand Plateaus (6
By
Dc_