Interlocutor:
well so you had that idea right ?
Me i was off kilter
but it's a winning idea suggesting anything other than shakespeare was god or
(a commonplace in 19c england )
Interlocutor
milton greater?
Me: Energy I am talking about or was but even there I was wrong ... let me qualify that modified remark __ long winded as it was __ conjuncted by em-dashes ____ ?
that shakespeare's work is no less greater than milton's its more like rather akin to say Jupiter and Saturn? so rotating moons so okay
he was like god
the god of creation (becomings)
(he was not Like god He was god in the sense that the english had their collective energies' mirror reflected right back to them at the moment of their greatest creation he was a revolution he was in that sense their god in the sense that god means the energy of creation at a given moment
the theologians got it alll wrong in this sense that they belive the work of a god's done once and for all)
for creators and co-creators there is no like but become i become what you are i become the sympathetic bolt of lightening inventiing in the moment the flash of its need
shakespeare's historians are shakespeare i.e. the histories...
but it's not it's the ongoingness right 'les devenirs'
yclept the 'mind' even at its beginnings is this a brother then to Mozart ?
the other whiz deity to compare to a s ummerrrrrrrrrrrrrrr's day
o bright shining star
OLadies and Genitalmen! in this corner at 187 pounds dead at 52
William de Shakespeare
World heavy champion of
37
plays 100 sonnets
property owner and chief gentleman and actor,
share holder 3 narrative poems of love & bicker sorrow
William the Shake shake that thing